fabricating cases of a sexual nature fleecing unsuspecting Florida investors and others out of
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releasePeople & organizations named in this document
Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Document text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
fabricating cases of a sexual nature fleecing unsuspecting Florida investors and others out of
millions of dollars for cases of a sexual nature with--I'd like to answer your questions; however if
I--I'm told that if I do so, I risk losing my counsel's representation; therefore I must accept their
advice." Epstein deposition, March 8, 2010, at 106 (Deposition attachment #10).
56. | When Edwards had the opportunity to take Epstein’s deposition, he only asked
reasonable questions, all of which related to the merits of the cases against Epstein. All
depositions of Epstein in which Mr. Edwards participated on behalf of his clients are attached to
this motion. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit “N” at §11 and Deposition attachments #1, 6, 7, 10,
11, 12, and 13. Cf. with Deposition of Epstein taken by an attorney representing BB (one in
which Edwards was not participating), http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-dqoEyY Xx4; and
http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=Y CNiYItW-10
57. Edwards's efforts to obtain information about Epstein’s organization for
procuring young girls was also blocked because Epstein’s co-conspirators took the Fifth.
Deposition of Sarah Kellen, March 24, 2010 (hereinafter “Kellen Depo.”) (Deposition
attachment #14); Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova, April 13, 2010, (Deposition attachment #9);
Deposition of Adriana Mucinska Ross, March 15, 2010 (hereinafter “Ross Depo.”) (Deposition
attachment #15). Each of these co-conspirators invoked their respective rights against self-
incrimination as to all relevant questions, and the depositions have been attached.
58. At all relevant times Edwards has had a good faith basis to believe and did in fact
believe Sarah Kellen was an employee of Epstein’s and had been identified as a defendant in at
least one of the complaints against Epstein for her role in bringing girls to Epstein’s mansion to
be abused. At the deposition, she was represented by Bruce Reinhart. She invoked the Fifth on
22
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010587
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents