Document

84 4 Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures

Ref IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013000.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

People & organizations named in this document

Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

84 4 Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures Joshua Blue is not under active development and has not been for some time; however, the project may be reanimated in future. Joshua Blue’s core knowledge representation is a semantic network of nodes connected by links along which activation spreads. Although many of the nodes have specific semantic refer- ents, as in a classical semantic net, the spread of activation through the network is designed to lead to the emergence of “assemblies” (which could also be thought of as dynamical attractors) in a manner more similar to an attractor neural network. A major difference from typical semantic or neural network models is the central role that affect plays in the system’s dynamics. The weights of the links in the knowledge base are adjusted dynamically based on the emotional context — a very direct way of ensuring that cognitive processes and mental representations are continuously influenced by affect. Qualitatively, this mimics the way that particular emotions in the human brain correlate with the dissemination throughout the brain of particular neurotransmitters, which then affect synaptic activity. A result of this architecture is that in Joshua Blue, emotion directs attention in a very direct way: affective weighting is important in determining which associated objects will become part of the focus of attention, or will be retained from memory. A notable similarity between CogPrime and Joshua Blue is that in both systems, nodes are assigned two quantitative attention values, one governing allocation of current system resources (mainly processor time; this is CogPrime’s ShortTermImportance) and one governing the long-term allocation of memory (CogPrime’s LongTermImportance). The concrete work done with Joshua Blue involved using it to control a simple agent in a sim- ulated world, with the goal that via human interaction, the agent would develop a complex and humanlike emotional and motivational structure from its simple in-built emotions and drives, and would then develop complex cognitive capabilities as part of this development process. 4.5.7 LIDA The LIDA architecture developed by Stan Franklin and his colleagues [BF 09] is based on the concept of the “cognitive cycle” - a notion that is important to nearly every BICA (Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures) and also to the brain, but that plays a particularly central role in LIDA. As Franklin says, "as a matter of principle, every autonomous agent, be it human, animal, or artificial, must frequently sample (sense) its environment, process (make sense of) this input, and select an appropriate response (action). The agent’s “life” can be viewed as consisting of a continual sequence of iterations of these cognitive cycles. Such cycles constitute the indivisible elements of attention, the least sensing and acting to which we can attend. A cognitive cycle can be thought of as a moment of cognition, a cognitive "moment"." 4.5.8 The Global Workspace LIDA is heavily based on the “global workspace” concept developed by Bernard Baars. As this concept is also directly relevant to CogPrime it is worth briefly describing here. In essence Baars’ Global Workspace Theory (GWT) is a particular hypothesis about how working memory works and the role it plays in the mind. Baars conceives working memory as the HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013000

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents