84 4 Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releasePeople & organizations named in this document
Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Document text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
84 4 Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures
Joshua Blue is not under active development and has not been for some time; however, the
project may be reanimated in future.
Joshua Blue’s core knowledge representation is a semantic network of nodes connected by
links along which activation spreads. Although many of the nodes have specific semantic refer-
ents, as in a classical semantic net, the spread of activation through the network is designed to
lead to the emergence of “assemblies” (which could also be thought of as dynamical attractors)
in a manner more similar to an attractor neural network.
A major difference from typical semantic or neural network models is the central role that
affect plays in the system’s dynamics. The weights of the links in the knowledge base are adjusted
dynamically based on the emotional context — a very direct way of ensuring that cognitive
processes and mental representations are continuously influenced by affect. Qualitatively, this
mimics the way that particular emotions in the human brain correlate with the dissemination
throughout the brain of particular neurotransmitters, which then affect synaptic activity.
A result of this architecture is that in Joshua Blue, emotion directs attention in a very direct
way: affective weighting is important in determining which associated objects will become part of
the focus of attention, or will be retained from memory. A notable similarity between CogPrime
and Joshua Blue is that in both systems, nodes are assigned two quantitative attention values,
one governing allocation of current system resources (mainly processor time; this is CogPrime’s
ShortTermImportance) and one governing the long-term allocation of memory (CogPrime’s
LongTermImportance).
The concrete work done with Joshua Blue involved using it to control a simple agent in a sim-
ulated world, with the goal that via human interaction, the agent would develop a complex and
humanlike emotional and motivational structure from its simple in-built emotions and drives,
and would then develop complex cognitive capabilities as part of this development process.
4.5.7 LIDA
The LIDA architecture developed by Stan Franklin and his colleagues [BF 09] is based on the
concept of the “cognitive cycle” - a notion that is important to nearly every BICA (Biologically
Inspired Cognitive Architectures) and also to the brain, but that plays a particularly central
role in LIDA. As Franklin says, "as a matter of principle, every autonomous agent, be it human,
animal, or artificial, must frequently sample (sense) its environment, process (make sense of)
this input, and select an appropriate response (action). The agent’s “life” can be viewed as
consisting of a continual sequence of iterations of these cognitive cycles. Such cycles constitute
the indivisible elements of attention, the least sensing and acting to which we can attend. A
cognitive cycle can be thought of as a moment of cognition, a cognitive "moment"."
4.5.8 The Global Workspace
LIDA is heavily based on the “global workspace” concept developed by Bernard Baars. As this
concept is also directly relevant to CogPrime it is worth briefly describing here.
In essence Baars’ Global Workspace Theory (GWT) is a particular hypothesis about how
working memory works and the role it plays in the mind. Baars conceives working memory as the
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013000
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents