Document

170 9 General Intelligence in the Everyday Human World

Ref IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013086.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

170 9 General Intelligence in the Everyday Human World real-world naive physics need to be? This is a question to which we have no scientific answer at present. Our own working hypothesis is that the analogy does not need to be extremely close, and with this in mind in Chapter 16 we propose a virtual environment BlocksNBeads World that encompasses all the basic conceptual phenomena of real-world naive physics, but does not attempt to emulate their details. Framed in terms of human psychology rather than environment design, the question be- comes: At what level of detail must one model the physical world to understand the ways in which human intelligence has adapted to the physical world?. Our suspicion, which underlies our BlocksNBeadsWorld design, is that it’s approximately enough to have e Newtonian physics, or some close approximation e Matter in multiple phases and forms vaguely similar to the ones we see in the real world: solid, liquid, gas, paste, goo, etc. e Ability to transform some instances of matter from one form to another e Ability to flexibly manipulate matter in various forms with various solid tools e Ability to combine instances of matter into new ones in a fairly rich way: e.g. glue or tie solids togethermix liquids together, etc. e Ability to position instances of matter with respect to each other in a rich way: e.g. put liquid in a solid cavity, cover something with a lid or a piece of fabric, etc. It seems to us that if the above are present in an environment, then an AGI seeking to achieve appropriate goals in that environment will be likely to form an appropriate “human- like physical-world intuition." We doubt that the specifics of the naive physics of different forms of matter are critical to human-like intelligence. But, we suspect that a great amount of unconscious human metaphorical thinking is conditioned on the fact that humans evolved around matter that takes a variety of forms, can be changed from one form to another, and can be fairly easily arranged and composited to form new instances from prior ones. Without many diverse instances of matter transformation, arrangement and composition in its experience, an AGI is unlikely to form an internal “metaphor-base” even vaguely similar to the human one — so that, even if it’s highly intelligent, its thinking will be radically non-human-like in character. Naturally this is all somewhat speculative and must be explored via experimentation. Maybe an elaborate blocks-world with only solid objects will be sufficient to create human-level, roughly human-like AGI with rich spatiotemporal and manipulative intuition. Or maybe human intel- ligence is more closely adapted to the specifics of our physical world — with water and dirt and plants and hair and so forth — than we currently realize. One thing that és very clear is that, as we proceed with embodying, situating and educating our AGI systems, we need to pay careful attention to the way their intelligence is conditioned by their environment. 9.5 Folk Psychology Related to naive physics is the notion of “naive psychology” or “folk psychology” [Rav04], which includes for instance the following aspects: 1. Mental simulation of other agents 2. Mental theory regarding other agents 3. Attribution of beliefs, desires and intentions (BDI) to other agents via theory or simulation HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013086

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents