2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *943
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
Page 59 of 78
2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *943
Rule 60. Victims
(a) Rights of Victims.
(3) Right to Be Heard.
The court must permit a victim to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court concerning release . . .
involving the crime. +
Discussion:
The Advisory Committee's global proposal gives victims the right to be "heard" on release decisions; but it fails to spell out
what effect, if any, the [*944] victim's statement would have after the court heard the victim. In other words, the Advisory
Committee proposal seemingly codifies an empty gesture.
In contrast, my proposal would take the straightforward and important step of requiring a court to consider the views of the
victim in determining any release decision. 4°” That requirement is added directly into the rule governing release decisions -
Rule 46. Adding a specific rule with specific consequences is far preferable to the Advisory Committee's approach and is
consistent with the CVRA's goal of ensuring "reasonable conditions of pre-trial and post-conviction relief that include
protections for the victim's safety." +68
Rule 48 - Victims’ Views on Dismissal to be Considered The Proposals:
I proposed that the court should be required to consider the views of victims in deciding whether to grant a government's
motion to dismiss a case as follows:
Rule 48. Dismissal
(a) By the Government. The government may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint. The
government may not dismiss the prosecution during trial without the defendant's consent. In deciding whether to grant the
government's motion to dismiss, the court shall consider the views of any victims. 4°?
The Advisory Committee proposed no change to this rule. 47°
Discussion:
The Advisory Committee declined to adopt this recommendation for several reasons:
The Subcommittee recognized that victims will have a great interest in whether charges are dismissed. The CVRA does not,
however, explicitly address dismissals, and it speaks only of not excluding the [victim] from, and providing the [victim with]
. aright to be reasonably heard at public proceedings in the district court. If the government moves for dismissal there is
ordinarily no public proceeding. (When there is a [*945] public proceeding, the victim's right not to be excluded, and to be
reasonably heard 1s provided for in Rule [60].)
466 Proposed Amendments, supra note 71, R. 60(a)(3), at 16.
467 Existing law has places where a victim's views could profitably be brought to bear. See, e.g., /8 U.S.C. § 3142(c) (court to consider
whether release of the defendant "will endanger the safety of any other person").
468 See, e.g., 150 Cong. Rec. $10910, $10910 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl).
469 Cassell, Proposed Amendments, supra note 4, at 918.
479 See Proposed Amendments, supra note 71 (showing no proposed change for Rule 48).
DAVID SCHOEN
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017694
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents