Benchmarking across the topical market, we would highlight the absolute number of
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
COWEN
COLLABORATIVE INSIGHTS
February 25, 2019
Benchmarking across the topical market, we would highlight the absolute number of
brands offering a product, which while not exhaustive, provides context on the
popularity of the form factor. Similar to most other verticals, Mary's topicals fall into the
super-premium segment, which we define as anything above $0.54 per mg of CBD. Of all
the SKUs analyzed, the premium segment looks to be the narrowest, while mainstream
and value segments are the most popular price point among the competitive set.
Figure 51 Popularity in Topicals Are Reflected In The Overall Number Of Brands Playing Within The Segment
$0.80 $0.74
$0.70 $0.62$0.61$0.60
ae $0.45
$0.40
$0.30
$0.20
$0.10
$0.00
Sagely Naturals
Curaleaf Hemp
Kush Queen
a
©
=
2
r=]
‘=
=]
5
=
wv
>
=
6
=
Super Premium
(> $0.54)
$0.40
$0.32$0.32¢9 30
Mazz Hanna
RX CannaCare
CBD Topicals by Price Segment
0.26$0.25
: : . £650.19 175
S 1750. 0.16$0.15 $
S S ‘ : , 0.1250.11$0 10$0 10s0 085
25 235 2350.22 Sc 5$0.14 5 e : 0.0 $0.05$0.0550.
Mary's Medicinals
Green Roads
Hemp Bombs
Highline
LEEF Organics
Medix CBD
Canna Hemp X
Bee's Knees
Wildflower
Pure Kana
Canna Hemp
Premium Jane
Try the CBD
Green Mountain
Main
($0.21-50.38)
Source: Company Websites and Cowen and Company
Note: Reflects price per mg of CBD; For companies with multiple SKUs, we used a straight line average
According to our proprietary Cowen consumer survey, of respondents who use CBD,
26.2% of people use topicals as a form factor, which is the highest level seen after
tinctures. Usage among men and women look to be similar, though younger, lower
income use looks to be more prevalent when benchmarking to older, higher income
cohorts. Similar to capsules, this could reflect the large number of brands we see playing
in the value segment.
Figure 52 Topical Use Is More Prevalent Among Younger, Lower Income Consumers
35.0%
30.0% 26.2% 26.5%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
Male
Gender
CBD Topical Use
30.1%
° 27.8%, 29.3%
25.8%
Female <S50K S$50K-$100K >$ 100K
Income
Source: Cowen Survey, N=~2500, January 2019
36
COWEN.COM
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024852
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents