Email

From: Sultan Bin Sulayern [i

Dated August 12, 2011 Ref IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

People & organizations named in this document

Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

From: Sultan Bin Sulayern [i Sent: 8/12/2011 2:43:12 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Importance: — High Newsmax.com Laffer: Obama Must Use Reaganomics to Save Economy The only way President Barack Obama can solve the nation’s economic woes is to adopt “common-sense” Reaganomics, the policy’s architect Arthur Laffer claims in an exclusive Newsmax interview. Laffer said the White House called him in the spring and asked him to speak to Obama’s former Council of Economic Advisors’ chairman Austen Goolsbee — and he had told him exactly the same thing. “Reaganomics would fix any economy that’s in the doldrums,” Laffer said. “It’s not a magic sauce, it’s common sense. “You’ve got to get rid of all federal taxes in the extreme and replace them with a low-rate flat tax on business net sales, and on personal unadjusted gross income. That’s number one. “Number two, you have to have spending restraint. Government spending causes unemployment, it does not cure unemployment. ‘Number three, you need sound money. Ben Bernanke is running the least sound monetary policy I’ve ever heard of," Laffer said. “Number four you need regulations, but you don’t need those regulations to go beyond the purpose at hand and create collateral damage. The regulatory policies are really way off here. “And lastly you need free trade," Laffer said. "Foreigners produce some things better than we do and we produce some things better than foreigners. It would be foolish in the extreme if we didn’t sell them those things we produce better than they do in exchange for those things they produce better than we do.” In the interview the veteran economist said Standard & Poor’s was quite right in downgrading the U.S. credit rating — in fact it should have done so far earlier. The agency had no choice and if the other agencies, Moody’s and Fitch, don’t do the same they won’t be doing their jobs, said Laffer, who gave his name to the Laffer Curve which demonstrates that the maximum amount of government revenue does not come at the point of maximum taxes. “If you had a company that had revenues of $2% million and expenses of $4 million, with no change in sight, $1% million in losses each year as far as the eye can see and it had already borrowed $10 million, what would you rate that company? I surely wouldn’t rate it AAA. “That is the U.S. situation today,” Laffer said. "Taxes are about $2 trillion, government spending is about $4 trillion and we have about $10 trillion in net national debt. I don’t see that as being a AAA country. “Tf the S&P and the others were doing their jobs correctly, they should have downgraded a long time ago.” Laffer said he has no doubt the country will win its top rating back, but only when economic policies are HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents