INDIVIDUAL TAXES (continued)
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
TAX BULLETIN 2018-1: TAX REFORM SIGNED INTO LAW
INDIVIDUAL TAXES (continued)
2017 Law
2018 Law
Itemized Deductions
Under the “Pease” limitation, up to 80% of
most itemized deductions are lost when
adjusted gross income exceeds $313,800
($261,500 for single taxpayers)
Repeals the Pease limitation on itemized
deductions
Mortgage interest deduction: $750,000 limit
on acquisition indebtedness retained
(principal or secondary residence);
deduction for home equity loan repealed
Deduction for state and local income, sales
tax and real property taxes limited to
$10,000 in aggregate ($5,000 for married
filing separately); deduction allowed for
state and local taxes on trade or business or
if related to production of income. Payment
of income taxes in 2017 for a subsequent
year would not be deductible in 2017.4
Deduction for medical expenses retained
and liberalized for 2017 and 2018 *
Retirement Savings
Contributions can be placed into deferred
account, up to contribution cap
Unchanged
AMT
Parallel tax calculation with top rate of 28%
and $84,500 exemption for married taxpayers
($54,300 others); phase out of exemption
begins at $160,900 for married taxpayers
($120,700 others)
Retains and modifies AMT; exemptions
raised to $109,400 (married) and $70,300
(others); phase-out of exemption begins at
$1 million for married taxpayers ($500,000
others).*
Carried Interest
Retains character as capital gain and eligible
for preferential tax rates
Requires three-year holding period to attain
long-term capital gains rate
Investment
3.8% tax on “net investment income”
Unchanged — continues to apply
Surtax
OBSERVATIONS — INDIVIDUAL TAXES
Under the Act, there will be winners and losers on the personal income tax side. Generally, wage earners from
no-tax states... could see tax savings under the Act. For instance, a Florida taxpayer earning $1 million with
moderate itemized deductions may see a tax savings of about $30,000 under the Act. A similar taxpayer in New
York State may see a savings of about $3,500 according to our preliminary analysis..©
Conversely, very high-wage earners from high-tax states could see a higher tax bill. A taxpayer earning $3 million
in New York City may see a significant tax increase: $44,000 under the Act, due in part to the loss of significant
deductions. A similar taxpayer in Florida would see a tax savings of about $91,000 under the Act (primarily due
to the lower top rate, elongated 35% tax bracket and regaining itemized deductions that are no longer phased-
out), according to our preliminary analysis.
Married couples could fare worse than two single taxpayers with a similar amount of income. The so-called
marriage penalty hits particularly hard under the new tax brackets. The penalty is also exacerbated by permitting
married couples only a $10,000 state income/real estate tax deduction, but allowing each of two single filers a
deduction in the same amount ($20,000 combined). Under the changes, a single taxpayer with $500,000 of wages
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents