Document

INDIVIDUAL TAXES (continued)

Ref IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

TAX BULLETIN 2018-1: TAX REFORM SIGNED INTO LAW INDIVIDUAL TAXES (continued) 2017 Law 2018 Law Itemized Deductions Under the “Pease” limitation, up to 80% of most itemized deductions are lost when adjusted gross income exceeds $313,800 ($261,500 for single taxpayers) Repeals the Pease limitation on itemized deductions Mortgage interest deduction: $750,000 limit on acquisition indebtedness retained (principal or secondary residence); deduction for home equity loan repealed Deduction for state and local income, sales tax and real property taxes limited to $10,000 in aggregate ($5,000 for married filing separately); deduction allowed for state and local taxes on trade or business or if related to production of income. Payment of income taxes in 2017 for a subsequent year would not be deductible in 2017.4 Deduction for medical expenses retained and liberalized for 2017 and 2018 * Retirement Savings Contributions can be placed into deferred account, up to contribution cap Unchanged AMT Parallel tax calculation with top rate of 28% and $84,500 exemption for married taxpayers ($54,300 others); phase out of exemption begins at $160,900 for married taxpayers ($120,700 others) Retains and modifies AMT; exemptions raised to $109,400 (married) and $70,300 (others); phase-out of exemption begins at $1 million for married taxpayers ($500,000 others).* Carried Interest Retains character as capital gain and eligible for preferential tax rates Requires three-year holding period to attain long-term capital gains rate Investment 3.8% tax on “net investment income” Unchanged — continues to apply Surtax OBSERVATIONS — INDIVIDUAL TAXES Under the Act, there will be winners and losers on the personal income tax side. Generally, wage earners from no-tax states... could see tax savings under the Act. For instance, a Florida taxpayer earning $1 million with moderate itemized deductions may see a tax savings of about $30,000 under the Act. A similar taxpayer in New York State may see a savings of about $3,500 according to our preliminary analysis..© Conversely, very high-wage earners from high-tax states could see a higher tax bill. A taxpayer earning $3 million in New York City may see a significant tax increase: $44,000 under the Act, due in part to the loss of significant deductions. A similar taxpayer in Florida would see a tax savings of about $91,000 under the Act (primarily due to the lower top rate, elongated 35% tax bracket and regaining itemized deductions that are no longer phased- out), according to our preliminary analysis. Married couples could fare worse than two single taxpayers with a similar amount of income. The so-called marriage penalty hits particularly hard under the new tax brackets. The penalty is also exacerbated by permitting married couples only a $10,000 state income/real estate tax deduction, but allowing each of two single filers a deduction in the same amount ($20,000 combined). Under the changes, a single taxpayer with $500,000 of wages HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents