Names that match “Ministry of Labor and Social Development”
25,339 documents found
there would be few left. The New York Times and its publishers
document The exercise of some discretion is necessary under the statutory scheme that currently criminalizes the publication of classified material. If all journalists who publish any classified material were to be prosecuted House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
there would be few left. The New York Times and its publishers
for much the same reason I favor precise and narrow national security codification. As I will now ex
document It is the great danger of top-down discretion in the area of regulating speech that led me to express one of the most controversial views a free speech advocate can hold: I favor precise and narrow “speech codes” on university campuses House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
for much the same reason I favor precise and narrow national security codification. As I will now explain
and a heavy burden should be placed on those who would censor to demonstrate with relative certainty
document “All speech should be presumed to be protected by the Constitution House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
and a heavy burden should be placed on those who would censor to demonstrate with relative certainty that the speech at issue
railing against visitor rules and curfews
document Though [students who seek to censor “offensive” speech] insist on being governed by the laws of the outside world when it comes to their personal lives House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
railing against visitor rules and curfews
Yet Despite My Strong Opposition To Censorship
document Yet despite my strong opposition to censorship House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
I have surprised both my supporters and detractors by calling for precise and narrow “speech codes” on campuses. My reasoning is simple: censorship is inevitable on all university campuses in extreme situations; if a professor used the “N” word to call on an African-American stu...
” and by defending them—on the merits—against well-documented charges of anti-Semitism. Moreover
document The civil liberties-free speech rationale does not work for Chomsky: civil libertarians who defend the free speech of neo-Nazis do not get into bed with them by legitimating their false “findings” as having been based on “extensive historical research House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
” and by defending them—on the merits—against well-documented charges of anti-Semitism. Moreover
and that if anyone has refused to hire her
document The orchestra board responded that Redgrave has earned more money since the cancellation than before it House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
and that if anyone has refused to hire her
applicable equally to right and left. Free speech for me but not for thee is the beginning of the ro
document Rules of academic freedom for professors must be neutral House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
applicable equally to right and left. Free speech for me but not for thee is the beginning of the road to tyranny.
The Final Part Of Mr. Finkelstein’s Quest For Tenure Is To Blame His Tenure Problems On “Outsiders.” He Claims That I Intruded Myself Into The Depaul Review Process
document The final part of Mr. Finkelstein’s quest for tenure is to blame his tenure problems on “outsiders.” He claims that I intruded myself into the DePaul review process House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
neglecting to mention that I was specifically asked by the former chairman of DePaul’s political science department to “point [him] to the clearest and most egregious instances of dishonesty on Finkelstein’s part.” I responded by providing hard evidence of made-up quotes and fact...
and may not be barred from speaking or publishing because those in control of government think that
document “The theory of our Constitution is that every citizen may speak his mind and every newspaper express its view on matters of public concern House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
and may not be barred from speaking or publishing because those in control of government think that what is said or written is unwise
” and instead of answering (or ignoring) me
document I characterized her opinion as a “Magna Carta for terrorism House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
” and instead of answering (or ignoring) me
This Reasoning Fails To Distinguish Between A 17 Year Old And A 10 Year Old. The Earlier Photographs Were Taken Of A 10 Year Old Kid
document This reasoning fails to distinguish between a 17 year old and a 10 year old. The earlier photographs were taken of a 10 year old kid House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
whose mother controlled what she would do. Her later appearances were made by a near-adult and were far more within her own control. The court simply ignored the argument by the 10 year old should not be bound by foolish decisions made by an ambitious mother when Brooke was too...
already brimming with energy and enthusiasm
document Alan Dershowitz immediately understood the impudence of Goldberg’s proposal. It was Dershowitz’s very first day on the job and the young clerk House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
already brimming with energy and enthusiasm
a punishment is cruel and unusual if it offends the contemporary sense of decency (for example
document (2) regardless of its effectiveness in achieving the permissible ends of punishment House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
a punishment is cruel and unusual if it offends the contemporary sense of decency (for example
Originally Devised; There Were Four New Nixon Appointees
document originally devised; there were four new Nixon appointees House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)
and it was clear that at least some of them believed the death penalty to be constitutional. The umpires — if not the rules — had been changed after the strategy of the game had been worked out and irretrievably put into action. Now there was no pulling back.
