Epstein Suite
Full-text search

Results for “Florida Supreme Court”

Search across the indexed text of every released document.

Names that match “Florida Supreme Court”

Florida · 188 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO · 67 Southern District of Florida · 25 Supreme Court · 23 U.S. District Court · 14 Court · 14

2,223 documents found

404 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?
document IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016094.txt House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

404 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet? Creative Survival Advantaget — That creativity has evolved to give us a survival advantage at all stages of evolution, not just when we evolve to the point where mathematical intuition is significant. 15. Free Will Laplace Daemon - A conceptua...

signup.html?partner=applenewséad
document IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028455.txt House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

signup.html?partner=applenewséad keywords=APPLEMOBILE&region=written throughé&asset_id=100000006123279", "range": {"length" :l1,"start":44},"type™:"link"}],"identifier":" anf-body- 3","inlineTextStyles": [{"range":{"length":57, "start":0},"textsStyle":" anf-ts- 10"},{"range":{"...

In Deciding Ncb’s Motions To Dismiss The Ashton And Burnett Complaints
document In deciding NCB’s motions to dismiss the Ashton and Burnett complaints House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

the Court ruled that NCB’s status as a foreign sovereign for purposes of immunity under the FSIA was unclear. It also questioned whether it had personal jurisdiction over NCB. The Court ordered limited jurisdictional discovery on both issues. Terrorist Attacks I

In Reaching This Conclusion
document In reaching this conclusion House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

the Court did not consider the supplemental material that the Burnett and Federal Plaintiffs submitted in opposition to Mr. Jalaidan’s motions to dismiss. (See Letter from Sean P. Carter to Court of June 23

Text 001 House Oversight 028413
document TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028413.txt House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

{"componentLayouts":{"ComponentLayout-1":{"columnRange":{"length":8,"start":0},"contentInset":{"bottom":false,"left":true,"right":true,"top":false},"identifier":"ComponentLayout-1","ignoreDocumentMargin":"both","margin":{"bottom":"25.0pt","top":"0.0pt"}},"ComponentLayout-10":{"c...

These Allegations And Al Qaeda’s Notorious Nature Make Plain The District Court’s Failure To Draw A Reasonable Inference That The Defendants Had The Requisite Mental State Of Knowingly Or Recklessly Advancing The Efforts Of A Terrorist Organization
document These allegations and al-Qaeda’s notorious nature make plain the district court’s failure to draw a reasonable inference that the defendants had the requisite mental state of knowingly or recklessly advancing the efforts of a terrorist organization House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

where the pleadings contained detailed allegations that they provided material support to al-Qaeda. A stark example is the district court’s failure to infer that Al Rajhi Bank knew or had reason to know that it was providing financial services to al-Qaeda

Id. At 239 (Emphasis Added). The Court’s “More Likely Than Not” And “Reasonable Trier Of Fact” Requirements Are Inconsistent With Iqbal/ Twombly
document Id. at 239 (emphasis added). The court’s “more likely than not” and “reasonable trier of fact” requirements are inconsistent with Iqbal/ Twombly House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

which only require that a plaintiff plead facts that permit “the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Iqbal

The Court Should Reverse The Dismissals Of Three Defendants The Saudi Joint Relief Committee And Saudi Red Crescent Society (Collectively
document The Court should reverse the dismissals of three defendants -- the Saudi Joint Relief Committee and Saudi Red Crescent Society (collectively House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

“Sovereign Defendants”) and National Commercial Bank (“NCB”) -- and remand for jurisdictional discovery on the basis of this Court’s recent *152 holding in Doe v. Bin Laden

The Court Dismissed Approximately 20 Defendants Pursuant To Rule 12(B)(6)
document The court dismissed approximately 20 defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

only five of which are the subject of this appeal. The district court also granted motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2) filed by approximately 60 defendants

All First Year Law Students At Yale Are Required To Participate In A Moot Court Competition. My Opponent Was A Classmate Named Taft
document All first year law students at Yale are required to participate in a moot court competition. My opponent was a classmate named Taft House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

one of whose ancestors was the President of the United States and the Chief Justice; another a senator from Ohio and the third the mayor of Cincinnati. It is fair to say at that time that Taft was one of the most prominent names in America. My mother was convinced that I couldn...

It Was The First Time In History That A Court—Any Court—Had Ruled That The Government Had No Power To Ban Or Prosecute An “Obscene” Film That Was Shown To The Public In A Theater. I Had Achieved A Total Victory Not Only For My Client
document It was the first time in history that a court—any court—had ruled that the government had no power to ban or prosecute an “obscene” film that was shown to the public in a theater. I had achieved a total victory not only for my client House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

but for my novel approach to offensiveness under the First Amendment. It was a heck of a way to begin my career as a lawyer. The victory would

The Court’s Decision Was Roundly Criticized By Many Feminists
document The court’s decision was roundly criticized by many feminists House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

on the ground that allowing the defense to have access to the complainant’s psychiatric records would discourage complainants from coming forward. The court was sensitive to this concern and said the following:

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
email TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt Jan 10, 2015 House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025)

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 1/10/2015 2:57:45 PM To: Michael Wolff Subject: Re: Importance: High talk then On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Michael Wolff <_____________________________> wrote: Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best...