and failed to draw inferences in the plaintiffs’ favor. The court also misconstrued the scope of
Results for “U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida”
Search across the indexed text of every released document.
Names that match “U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida”
2,476 documents found
in the sense that once the court gives notice that it is considering whether to issue a subpoena
a court could still decide to approve those
Epstein sued Rothstein and Edwards in Palm Beach County Court for racketeering
is the lawyer bringing the suit in county court in West Palm Beach
the court must not permit the taking of photographs
the court must fashion a reasonable procedure
the Advisory Committee should draft Rule 23 so that the trial court should
316 (1993) (arguing that the requirements of prosecutorial consent and court approval should be removed from
” predicted the outcome of corporate court
is the lawyer bringing the suit in county court in West Palm Beach
asking him to respond to her allegations in court.
the court should consider ""the relevance of the subpoenaed material to the defense."" 78! But this is an overly broad
did the Court find the evidence to be subpoenable. 78°
only where the court proceeds under paragraph (ii) but not under paragraph (1).